Mom Who Filed $8M Lawsuit Against "Judicial Conspirator" Dies
Judge Conspired with GAL & Ex to Take Kids
An Illinois mother, who filed an $8 million lawsuit against a judge for conspiring with a GAL and her ex to take her kids away, has died an unfortunate and untimely death.
Unbelievably, this is the third death of a Sister this month. Lizzie died 4th of July weekend, exactly five years after her children were taken: Mom Who Exposed Family Court Cover-Up of Sexual Abuse Dies "Mysterious" Death. Julia ended her life after her son was taken, also five years ago: NY Mom Commits Suicide after 5 Years of "Judicial Alienation" from Son.
Aneta lost her children seven years ago. It’s a cruel twist of fate that after she started a new life with a good man and had a baby, she passed away from an aggressive form of cancer.
Aneta joined The Women’s Coalition six years ago and become well-known amongst our Sisters after she filed a federal lawsuit back in 2020. Our Facebook post highlighting her lawsuit [before the launch of Women’s Coalition News & Views] went viral. This is not surprising, since thousands of women around the world have experienced similar violations of rights and laws.
In our last column about Julia, we introduced a new term to describe how judges are empowering fathers to take and turn children against mothers: “Judicial Alienation”. Aneta’s judge was also a Judicial Alienator, but her lawsuit evokes another useful term in identifying how mothers are losing custody: Judicial Conspirator.
One of Aneta’s claims in her lawsuit is that her judge conspired with the GAL [guardian ad litem] and her ex to destroy her relationship with her children. This is typical. Judges almost always have court-appointees and affiliates who aid and abet them in the great custody switch.
More on that below but first, Aneta’s story.
ANETA’S STORY
Aneta, an attorney, married and gave birth to three children, two boys and a girl. Her first son was born in 2007.
Her marriage ended in divorce in 2014.
The custody battle began like most. Aneta fought to maintain primary custody, having been the children’s primary bond and nurturer, thereby being in their best interests to continue living primarily with her.
But her ex was not interested in what was best for the kids. He was out for blood. And he knew the best way to destroy her was to take the children and turn them against her.
[The father] was out to accomplish destroying his ex-wife…personally, psychologically, financially, and professionally, as well as her relationship with their three minor children.
In 2015, her ex filed an emergency motion for sole custody on the bogus claim she was abusing the children. There was no evidence to support this and was later unfounded by CPS, but that did not matter.
Aneta was forced out of her home but was able to retain half parenting time. A few months later, the children told her their father was physically abusing them, and coercing and threatening them to report that she was abusing them.
In 2016, Aneta filed a motion for change of custody to her to protect them from their father’s abuse. She had proof of this via CPS. At the same time, she filed a motion for contempt due to his refusal to bring them to court-ordered therapy. Of course, all that credible evidence was ignored and custody remained with the father.
Her ex responded to the kids’ reports of abuse in the usual way: by accusing Aneta of alienation. He ratcheted up his campaign of false allegations against her by going to the police and CPS multiple times. These were all dismissed as unfounded.
[The ex-husband] falsely and maliciously alleged that Aneta was physically and mentally abusing their three minor children and he initiated numerous complaints against Aneta with Department of Children and Family Services.
CONSPIRACY KICKS IN
In 2017, Associate Judge Robert Wade Johnson was assigned to her case.
The GAL had been informed by the social worker that the allegations by the father were unfounded and she had not abused or alienated the children. She told him that he was the one coaching the children to say Aneta was abusive and that he was the abusive one.
[The father] forces them to say she is beating them, punishes them unless they repeat the allegations, and tells them that he will know if they tell “the truth” (e.g., to their therapists, the school social worker, GAL, and the DCFS worker).
Judge Johnson did nothing to curtail the documented physical and emotional abuse by the father.
In 2018, Aneta’s oldest son reported his father’s physical and emotional abuse to CPS and police. There was a forensic interview that confirmed the abuse.
On one occasion, the two older children refused to go on a visit with their abusive father. The father dispatched the police, but they would not make the kids go.
The father used this to claim Aneta was interfering with his parenting time, supporting his previous false claim of alienation. The GAL promoted this lie and recommended supervised visits for Aneta.
Judge Johnson continued to ignore the cumulative evidence of the father’s abuse. He refused to interview the children in chambers or allow Aneta’s 12 year old son to testify. He found Aneta in contempt for interfering with the father’s visits and restricted her to supervised visitation.
Aneta ended up getting very little supervised visitation time with her children, as her ex continually interfered. Six supervisors quit due to being verbally attacked by him. The kids also became abusive to the supervisors. They reported the children’s conduct was “outrageous, disrespectful and aggressive” and “their statements vulgar and threatening”.
Worse, they became out of control and abusive to Aneta as well. This was a direct result of being placed under the complete custody and control of the father.
My children went from loving and caring and wanting to spend time with me, to swearing at me and attacking me.
But the Judicial Alienator did nothing to stop the father’s interference with visitation and undue influence on the children. No, he had done his job—given the father sole custody and control over “his” children. And he ensured they remained alienated from their mother by doing nothing more.
Aneta did not see her children after that. She eventually began a new relationship and gave birth to a little girl named Ishka.
A few months ago, Aneta found out she had pancreatic cancer, one of the most aggressive forms of cancer.
RIP Aneta
GOFUNDME
A friend of Aneta’s started a GoFundMe to help her new family:
THE LAWSUIT
In 2020, Aneta filed a Federal lawsuit (pdf) in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division. She included her children as Plaintiffs. The defendants were the judge, GAL, and ex-husband.
The first count was Deprivation of due process and equal protection under 42 U.S. Code §1983. The second count was Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights under 42 U.S. Code §1985. The third and fourth counts were for abuse of process (misuse of legal procedures) and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
In the second count, Aneta claims there was a conspiracy amongst the judge, GAL and her ex. She claims it is “overwhelmingly clear” they “corruptly conspired” to “improperly interfere with her right to the companionship, love and affection of her three minor children” … and with her “fundamental rights and privileges to familial relations and to raise her three minor children which is secured by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment”.
By taking Aneta’s children away from her through this unlawful conspiracy, Aneta and her three minor children suffered severe physical and psychiatric injuries and were thus severely damaged.
She requested an excess of $8 million in compensatory and punitive damages.
Although her lawsuit was well-written by her, an attorney, and she made compelling arguments supported by abundant facts and evidence, her lawsuit was dismissed. She appealed to the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals. They affirmed.
The Appellate opinion basically said that custody matters are under State jurisdiction, not Federal, and Aneta’s claim of civil rights violations, corruption, and conspiracy were insufficient to override that precedent. It is unknown whether she appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, but, apparently, there was no further action.
Many victims of the Custody Crisis have filed similar civil rights lawsuits individually but rarely, if ever, win. The Women’s Coalition, however, is filing a “Discrimination against Women in Family Court” lawsuit, in which many mothers are coming together to claim they are victims of systemic discrimination [see below].
Aneta’s lawsuit was a valiant effort to hold those responsible for destroying her family. However, the system is specifically designed so there is no way to hold Family Court judges or their co-conspirators accountable.
“JUDICIAL CONSPIRACY”
The word conspiracy is often associated with conspiracy theorists—those who promote ideas that have little or no basis in fact. That tends to discredit people who are trying to expose true conspiracies.
A conspiracy is defined as a secret plot, ploy, scheme, or agreement between two or more people for an unlawful or harmful purpose. What Family Court judges and their lackeys are doing when they unjustly switch custody to fathers fits that description.
Since there are thousands of mothers who can attest to their judges conspiring with their ex and others to wrongly switch custody, it supports the existence of a Judicial Conspiracy in each case. More importantly, since this is so rampant, it supports Judicial Conspiracy being a key aspect of the systemic entitling of men and oppression of women in family courts.
There are usually multiple co-conspirators in Custody Crisis cases, but judges are the ones in charge and the ones who make the orders. They are da Boss. Hence, judges are Judicial Conspirators and their lackeys Judicial Co-conspirators who facilitate the custody switch and give judges cover in the process.
Judicial Co-conspirators can be court-appointees or court-affiliates.
Court-Appointee co-conspirators include children’s legal representatives and mental health professionals. The legal representatives include minor’s counsels, GAL’s, guardians, court-appointed special advocates [CASA’s], et. al. Mental health professionals include custody evaluators, parental assessors, social workers, psychologists, therapists, et. al.
Court-Affiliate co-conspirators include child protective services workers, mediators, law enforcement officials, district attorneys, criminal court judges, forensic investigators, et. al. Fathers’ attorneys are often connected with judges and some facilitate campaign and other funds being directed to them. Even mothers’ attorneys covertly conspire with judges to steer cases to fathers in order to stay in the good the good graces of the Court.
Each mother’s case has a different combination of these co-conspirators. Of course, not all appointees and affiliates conspire, but the judge simply cites the ones who get with the program and ignore the ones who don’t.
The judge does not need to make an express agreement or even communicate with co-conspirators, because they already know the program. There is often a much used cabal of co-conspirators in each jurisdiction who outlast judges and can be counted on for…you know what.
So we have two new terms that often go together. Judicial Alienation almost always involves a Judicial Conspiracy to justify the excision of children from the mother’s life. But having co-conspirators makes it easier in every case. They give the judge a reason to cite in their findings for switching custody and provide the “They made me do it” cover.
Mothers often fall into the trap of blaming a co-conspirator, but the truth is, judges are not being misled by them. Judges know exactly what they are doing. [See Down the Court-Appointee Rabbit Hole.]
Judges acting within a system that gives them virtually absolute power is the problem. Custody cases need to be heard in a real civil court where juries are the fact-finders, not judges.
Join our Women’s Coalition where we are uniting to demand a new system.
Join Sisters in Solidarity to engage in activism to end the Crisis.
IN OTHER NEWS
DISCRIMINATION LAWSUIT
The Women’s Coalition is working on a “Discrimination against Women in Family Court” lawsuit.
Our lawsuit claims it is systemic discrimination that is causing women to lose custody. Family court judges are violating women’s right to due process and equal protection—because they are women. Our first filing will be in New York.
If you are a woman who lost custody unjustly in Family Court, you may join our lawsuit.
U.S. mothers: fill out this form.
Other countries: fill out this form.
More info about the discrimination lawsuit
NEXT SECTION OF SAGA OF ONE F**KED MOTHER IS OUT!
Legion has reconnected with her long-lost sister, Endys, and finally asks why she and her mother and siblings hadn’t supported her through the immense pain at losing her boys and her desperate efforts to get them back. But Endys has no empathy and shows zero outrage at what was done to her by Herry and the Court.
Endys minimizes the horror of Herry’s violence and abuse by calling him a “bonehead”. She places blame on Legion for being “tricked” by Herry and for being a “sinner” who needs to be “redeemed”. Legion decides she doesn’t want that toxic energy in her life and hangs up, never to speak to her again. That means there is no one in her blood family alive who supports her.
This concludes Chapter 28 and Act III of Dr. True’s Opera. But the fat lady—Justice—is not all sung out yet…
In the last section, Legion resolves to make women aware of the rampant sexism in family court after the patriarchal Chief Justice corruptly turns the True Majority Opinion into the Dissenting Opinion by appointing two of his buddies onto the panel. She laments how her “male-identified” mother and three siblings were unsupportive in her battle to regain custody of her boys—when she needed them most. She reconnects with a sister who had disappeared from her life.
All published chapters are included in the Section: “Saga of One F**ked Mother” accessible on the top bar of the home page of Women’s Coalition News & Views. Sequential chapters are emailed every Wednesday so make sure to subscribe if you haven’t yet!
TEASERS
So where, ah, just exactly WHERE, … where WAS my family for me? Ya’ know, the ones like my sisters and my mother and my brother who were supposed to’ve gone to The Mat and to The Ends of the Earth for me? Where WERE you all?!
“Well, Herry was just a bonehead and tricked you.” …I replied…“A bonehead?…That’s like calling Osama bin Laden a bonehead or Adolf Hitler a bonehead. Herry was a freakin’ thug, a terrorist, a savage and a criminal, Endys! WHERE WAS my family to try to help me protect myself and my kids?!!!!”
I could not permit that toxin, that poison––not even its littlest drops’ worth of venom––to be aspersed onto my essence and my energy again. My blood will not be dirtied, will not be contaminated by that type of blood anymore, full sibling to me––or not!
Women's Coalition News & Views is a reader-supported publication. Please consider a paid subscription of just $5/mo, $50/yr or $200 founding member to support our important work of exposing and ending the Custody Crisis! [Check alternate inboxes.]
You may also give a gift subscription to a friend who is a victim of the Custody Crisis.
Or feel free to support the Coalition’s work through a one-time or recurring contribution through the Paypal Giving Fund.
All contributions are greatly appreciated!
Family Court must be abolished. These poor women!! I was given every other weekend and no contact on holidays and Mother’s Day. When the judge gave him sole custody, the ex’s wife, who enjoys her job at the courthouse working in the Probation Department in the Erie County Courthouse, PA, started jumping up and down, whooping, clapping and cheering along with her three sisters, mother and grandparents. The following day, the ex ran down to Domestic Relations and filed for child support (This was AFTER they made up false allegations to CPS of Emotional Child Abuse AND his attorney said I was mentally ill and alienating the kids from the father). All of this worked in their favor causing a major heart attack and severe alienation from my 3 (now adult) children. To answer anyone’s question if Family Court kills, the answer is YES.
#3 D E A D This Very y2025 - Month ... ...
¡ Judicial Alienator - / Judicial Conspirator so three kiddos now M O T H E R L E S S !
NEEDED: O N L Y JURIES to decide cases of CHILD CUSTODY in dispute. ZERO judges.
Doc