" A fair custody determination in the best interests of the children can only be made if cases are heard in a regular civil court where judges have no more power than a normal judge and where they do not have the power to appoint anyone. There should be no appointees at all in contested custody cases. Evidence should GO STRAIGHT TO THE J U R Y and parents can hire their own experts if they want. Judges should have nothing to do with it. "
SYCOPHANTIC ENABLERS:
" These court - appointee positions attract the worst of the worst kind of humans: liars and bullies, greedy sociopaths, and losers who have no problem destroying mothers’ and children’s lives. These despicable POS’s stoop so low as to cover up child sexual abuse and aid in putting victims under the control of the father molester.
Although these court-appointees are the worst kind of people, they are not the cause of the crisis…just a symptom.
The main takeaway is that judges are not being misled by their very own appointees. Judges have the facts and evidence in front of them and know exactly what they are doing. They appoint professionals to aid and abet them in the agenda of granting custody to the father. Recommendations by appointees give judges something to hang their hat on in their findings and orders, while the enforcers and informers make sure court orders are followed. Court-appointees also give judges cover for their role in the fraud and coercion used to switch custody. Unfortunately, mothers are led to believe that court-appointees are neutral players, necessary in the process of deciding custody.
MOTHERS NEED TO BE WARNED AHEAD OF TIME that these court actors are far from neutral and will most likely do damage to their case. They should be avoided if at all possible. "
I’ve been representing #ProtectiveMothers in child custody and CPS cases nationally (proving CSA, CPA, & DV) for over 20 years and all over NC for 35. I am now also helping other attorneys nationally to navigate the minefields as a Case Consultant.
Mothers & attorneys can read 3 free legal articles on my website and learn about how to navigate these cases and the way I’ve been doing my Consultations by reading, reviewing a chronological history, of the case, the entire relationship between the parties, the relevant documents and evidence such as psych or custody evals, criminal records, substantive witness lists, etc.
Before writing their history and figuring out what to send me (for my case consultant or Direct representation attorney consultation), I have them all read these articles on my website: Protecting Your Child (which involves all the court-appointed players and entities) and the dynamics of how each player can affect your case), Gathering Evidence, and How to Prepare for Your Consultation, all listed in the menu of my website https://ArlaineRockey.com.
Family court judges do not rule in a child's best interests. Court-appointees usually go along to get along. Patriarchy dominates family court. Women are powerless to protect their children. Family court must end.
This is 100% true. The only way to reform the courts it to return it to a civil court process with a jury. Due process and civil rights must be respected and enforced. Anything less will fail.
EXCELLENT, Executive Director Dumas. EXCELLENT. Thank YOU. Dr Blue
Thanks!
" A fair custody determination in the best interests of the children can only be made if cases are heard in a regular civil court where judges have no more power than a normal judge and where they do not have the power to appoint anyone. There should be no appointees at all in contested custody cases. Evidence should GO STRAIGHT TO THE J U R Y and parents can hire their own experts if they want. Judges should have nothing to do with it. "
SYCOPHANTIC ENABLERS:
" These court - appointee positions attract the worst of the worst kind of humans: liars and bullies, greedy sociopaths, and losers who have no problem destroying mothers’ and children’s lives. These despicable POS’s stoop so low as to cover up child sexual abuse and aid in putting victims under the control of the father molester.
Although these court-appointees are the worst kind of people, they are not the cause of the crisis…just a symptom.
The main takeaway is that judges are not being misled by their very own appointees. Judges have the facts and evidence in front of them and know exactly what they are doing. They appoint professionals to aid and abet them in the agenda of granting custody to the father. Recommendations by appointees give judges something to hang their hat on in their findings and orders, while the enforcers and informers make sure court orders are followed. Court-appointees also give judges cover for their role in the fraud and coercion used to switch custody. Unfortunately, mothers are led to believe that court-appointees are neutral players, necessary in the process of deciding custody.
MOTHERS NEED TO BE WARNED AHEAD OF TIME that these court actors are far from neutral and will most likely do damage to their case. They should be avoided if at all possible. "
I’ve been representing #ProtectiveMothers in child custody and CPS cases nationally (proving CSA, CPA, & DV) for over 20 years and all over NC for 35. I am now also helping other attorneys nationally to navigate the minefields as a Case Consultant.
Mothers & attorneys can read 3 free legal articles on my website and learn about how to navigate these cases and the way I’ve been doing my Consultations by reading, reviewing a chronological history, of the case, the entire relationship between the parties, the relevant documents and evidence such as psych or custody evals, criminal records, substantive witness lists, etc.
Before writing their history and figuring out what to send me (for my case consultant or Direct representation attorney consultation), I have them all read these articles on my website: Protecting Your Child (which involves all the court-appointed players and entities) and the dynamics of how each player can affect your case), Gathering Evidence, and How to Prepare for Your Consultation, all listed in the menu of my website https://ArlaineRockey.com.
Family court judges do not rule in a child's best interests. Court-appointees usually go along to get along. Patriarchy dominates family court. Women are powerless to protect their children. Family court must end.
This is 100% true. The only way to reform the courts it to return it to a civil court process with a jury. Due process and civil rights must be respected and enforced. Anything less will fail.