Oct 2, 2023Liked by Womens Coalition International
Training won't help women and children in family court. Judges have complete power and control in family court. Their opinion alone counts. Family court judges intentionally abuse their power to maintain systemic male entitlement. These judges knowingly give child custody to abusive fathers. Family court judges purposely endanger children. Family court judges need to lose their power. Family court needs to end, and we need a new system.
I agree that judges have complete control. In my experience in the Family Court, the judges just DID NOT OBEY THE LAW. As a result of this rough journey, I now have a GLOBEL PETITION going on to UN PETITIONS TEAM @ https://chn.ge/2Hpu2aa - I am trying to get WOMEN'S HUMAN RIGHTS INTERNATIONAL LAW [CEDAW] into the domestic level.
Well , part of my family’s abuse is directly connected to Harvard University . Jeffery Epstein had a office at Harvard University and that’s where my college age daughter was taken into a dark cult . All funded by her own father .
Harvard has to answer for what happened to my daughter and other girls called there by JE cult .
Oh I love this one. 👏👍❤️ I so agree. I’ve had my stories with sexual connected abuse involving Harvard trained staff and reported it to Mass General many years ago to support other women. I saw some of this dark activity in research labs (animals and all) as well at Mass General when I was tried to be led there during a supposed physical rehab appointment. Luckily I could see the danger signs of being closed in with no way out and left immediately.
I believe the raising of our children be in the parent’s hands. If a partner is abusive the child would be removed from seeing him/her/them. Instead of spending $85k leave with the children to a safe unknown area until their old enough to be able to be taken easily and before the court intervenes. There will be no laws broken at this point.
We’re all saying/experiencing the same abuse from the family courts & for all the same reasons; I was once a strong, capable woman with the ability to achieve what I wanted to achieve. My abuser & Fam Cts thwarted this but they will never stop me mothering my children
Sadistic behavior in the category of torture needs to be named as such. The level and types of violence are not correctly identified in court if they occur in a marriage. “Abuse” is too broad. Tactics used in conventration camps should not be minimized when they occur in a marriage. These are criminals, not just abusers and would not be allowed to work with children. Not should they be allowed custody or unsupervised visitation. The history of their behavior is being thrown out and jeopardizing children in name of father’s rights.
Attorneys have been saying that publicly for years. Not maybe in Australia but I filed my case in Inter-American commission 2007 - still going. Meiers did her study. Jessica Gonzales won her case with lawyers saying it.
She is a legal expert, not necessarily a family court expert. She is not a family court attorney. As stated, her expertise is on the intersection of science and the law. Her recognition that family court is operating unjustly and is not fixable is important from a general legal perspective even though she gets the solution wrong because no other attorneys are saying that--publicly anyway. But since it is misleading, the title has been changed to Harvard Trained Professor rather than Expert.
Training won't help women and children in family court. Judges have complete power and control in family court. Their opinion alone counts. Family court judges intentionally abuse their power to maintain systemic male entitlement. These judges knowingly give child custody to abusive fathers. Family court judges purposely endanger children. Family court judges need to lose their power. Family court needs to end, and we need a new system.
Criminal Abuse ! Corruption. Clean house .
I agree that judges have complete control. In my experience in the Family Court, the judges just DID NOT OBEY THE LAW. As a result of this rough journey, I now have a GLOBEL PETITION going on to UN PETITIONS TEAM @ https://chn.ge/2Hpu2aa - I am trying to get WOMEN'S HUMAN RIGHTS INTERNATIONAL LAW [CEDAW] into the domestic level.
Well , part of my family’s abuse is directly connected to Harvard University . Jeffery Epstein had a office at Harvard University and that’s where my college age daughter was taken into a dark cult . All funded by her own father .
Harvard has to answer for what happened to my daughter and other girls called there by JE cult .
Oh I love this one. 👏👍❤️ I so agree. I’ve had my stories with sexual connected abuse involving Harvard trained staff and reported it to Mass General many years ago to support other women. I saw some of this dark activity in research labs (animals and all) as well at Mass General when I was tried to be led there during a supposed physical rehab appointment. Luckily I could see the danger signs of being closed in with no way out and left immediately.
I believe the raising of our children be in the parent’s hands. If a partner is abusive the child would be removed from seeing him/her/them. Instead of spending $85k leave with the children to a safe unknown area until their old enough to be able to be taken easily and before the court intervenes. There will be no laws broken at this point.
We’re all saying/experiencing the same abuse from the family courts & for all the same reasons; I was once a strong, capable woman with the ability to achieve what I wanted to achieve. My abuser & Fam Cts thwarted this but they will never stop me mothering my children
Sadistic behavior in the category of torture needs to be named as such. The level and types of violence are not correctly identified in court if they occur in a marriage. “Abuse” is too broad. Tactics used in conventration camps should not be minimized when they occur in a marriage. These are criminals, not just abusers and would not be allowed to work with children. Not should they be allowed custody or unsupervised visitation. The history of their behavior is being thrown out and jeopardizing children in name of father’s rights.
Attorneys have been saying that publicly for years. Not maybe in Australia but I filed my case in Inter-American commission 2007 - still going. Meiers did her study. Jessica Gonzales won her case with lawyers saying it.
If she doesn't know these very basis things, as you point out, she is not an "expert" so don't call her one.
She is a legal expert, not necessarily a family court expert. She is not a family court attorney. As stated, her expertise is on the intersection of science and the law. Her recognition that family court is operating unjustly and is not fixable is important from a general legal perspective even though she gets the solution wrong because no other attorneys are saying that--publicly anyway. But since it is misleading, the title has been changed to Harvard Trained Professor rather than Expert.