K N O W THUS of Executive Director Dumas' ... ... TO YOUR CORE, Mamas: " ... ... those do not address the core cause of the Custody Crisis, which is systemic male entitlement—via judges [WORLDWIDE] having absolute power. The fact that judges can do whatever they want, and the agenda is to keep men empowered in the family after divorce, is the problem.
That means the only thing that will stop judges from wrongly switching custody to fathers is custody cases being heard in a real court, not a family court, with a jury as fact finder, not a judge. "
Your doubting, Mothers, that THE CORE CAUSE is NOT sexism / is NOT the hatred of women ?
Because, you say, the Century is NOW the 21st One Anyhow ? T H A T ?
T H A T doubting ... ... ONLY .IS. to YOUR O W N self - destruction, Mothers.
KNOW IT. BELIEVE IT. JOIN the Women's Coalition International's LAWSUIT.
The only way I was able to protect my daughter after many years of fighting and going on the run with her, was that we left the family court and went to the High Court, which agreed to take the case. This was in New Zealand after losing in the US and NZ family courts, but, sadly, this was before NZ signed The Hague, which it has now signed, and is another weapon used against Protective Mothers. There are few, if any, safe havens left for mothers and children to protect them from male and family court abuse.
Guardian ad litem for Harry = Ruth Moore O'farrel = WOMAN
At this point, if someone told me these women belong to a secret witches club I would believe it. Such Evil can only be perpetrated by those who worship Satan.
There is a consistent and deeply troubling PATTERN here, one which we can only ignore at our own peril. More and more court players involved in facilitating and executing these draconian orders are turning out to be FEMALES.
These Female judges, for reasons deliberately concealed from us, appear to HATE the natural Mother-Child bond. They know instinctively that the most effective way to inflict lasting psychological damage and traumatize both a mother and her children is through forced separation.
At the heart of all this intentional CRUELTY to children is the REJECTION of the natural, primal Mother-Child bond.
The 50/50 custody model serves to discredit and disrupt this primal bond. It disregards the biological, emotional, and developmental needs of children, especially in their formative years. It treats caregiving like a business contract, as if parenting is a shift-based job, rather than recognizing the continuity, stability, and nurturing that young minds and bodies require.
By rejecting this natural, primal mother-child bond, family, courts not only undermine maternal authority and attachment but also compromise the mental and physical health of both mother and child both in the short term and long term. No healthy child thrives in an arrangement where his or her emotional core is split down the middle to satisfy an illusion of fairness - A 50-50 custody serves the best interest of the manipulative and abusive court NOT the best interest of the child.
This rejection of the mother-child bond is also why they use the word *abduction* ONLY when the child chooses to leave with the mother but NOT when he is forcibly removed by the court and handed to the father against his or her will. Those who still refuse to see the double standards after knowing this are not ignorant - they are fully complicit.
Some female judges may hate mothers but they are all switching custody to fathers for the same reason as male judges: it's their job to keep men in power over "their" women and children after divorce. If they don't, they get out of favor with the Old Boy Network, don't get promoted, or worse, they lose their judgeship.
Family court is about male power and control. Women are disempowered. They have no enforceable rights in family court. Mothers cannot protect their children. Fathers that request child custody usually get it. It doesn't matter if they're emotionally and/or physically abusive. Family court judges frequently do not rule in a child's best interests. Children are considered male property. Women are often falsely deemed unfit. Loving mothers have their children taken. Ripping a child from his or her mother is cruel. Harry was traumatized. Children witness their mothers being handcuffed and taken away by police. Women are jailed or brought in for psychiatric evaluations for no good reason. Facts and evidence don't matter in family court. New laws and training programs won't help. Family court judges abuse their power. They endanger children and face no consequences. Family court judges enable fathers to alienate children from their mothers. Systemic male entitlement dominates family court. The old boys' club rules. Children deserve to be with their primary attachment figures. Loving mothers should receive primary custody. We need a new system. Women must continue to work together and demand a new system. A jury would give women and children a chance at justice. Family court must end.
That judge is not a woman. That's a man dressed up as a woman. It's part of their satanic religion to swop genders and really have no definable gender like satan. A bit of both.
That's great that you finally got custody back--that's rare. But just know that judges almost exclusively falsely accuse mothers of alienation, not fathers. And they enable fathers to alienate children from mothers, like they are doing in Nicola's case. That is because their job is to empower men after divorce. So it is not a "safe parent" issue. It is a women's empowerment issue. See our column about that: https://womenscoalition.substack.com/p/the-parental-alienation-rabbit-hole
It’s a common tactic here, popularized by Woody Allen (whose judge didn’t accept it), when sexual abuse is reported. Women are most often the targets of sexual abuse and nobody listens to us.
From my research advocates of PAS have troubling and unsafe views about children in general.
I know how it’s used now but the overall tactic is not new, it just formalized into a predatory industry trying to add it to the DSM and enforce property rights for parents who should not have access to children.
In my childhood my mother was the abuser and pulled this same number my father, who tried to get emergency custody but was denied. She moved me across the country and I didn’t know my real last name until 6th grade. He died before I could find him.
It was disheartening to discover our legal systemi, and children’s rights had not improved in 50 years and other countries have the same struggle.
The UN did a report on this recently, I included as evidence in my case. I’m
K N O W THUS of Executive Director Dumas' ... ... TO YOUR CORE, Mamas: " ... ... those do not address the core cause of the Custody Crisis, which is systemic male entitlement—via judges [WORLDWIDE] having absolute power. The fact that judges can do whatever they want, and the agenda is to keep men empowered in the family after divorce, is the problem.
That means the only thing that will stop judges from wrongly switching custody to fathers is custody cases being heard in a real court, not a family court, with a jury as fact finder, not a judge. "
Your doubting, Mothers, that THE CORE CAUSE is NOT sexism / is NOT the hatred of women ?
Because, you say, the Century is NOW the 21st One Anyhow ? T H A T ?
T H A T doubting ... ... ONLY .IS. to YOUR O W N self - destruction, Mothers.
KNOW IT. BELIEVE IT. JOIN the Women's Coalition International's LAWSUIT.
KNOW the Rabbit Holes: ... ...
https://womenscoalition.substack.com/p/custody-crisis-rabbit-holes-series
Doc
The only way I was able to protect my daughter after many years of fighting and going on the run with her, was that we left the family court and went to the High Court, which agreed to take the case. This was in New Zealand after losing in the US and NZ family courts, but, sadly, this was before NZ signed The Hague, which it has now signed, and is another weapon used against Protective Mothers. There are few, if any, safe havens left for mothers and children to protect them from male and family court abuse.
Can someone tell me how to share these stories of Facebook, or do you not want them shared?
You just need to copy and paste the url and Facebook does the rest. Thanks for sharing!
https://womenscoalition.substack.com/p/irish-mother-jailed-in-england-collusion
You can also restack on Substack to share.
🧑⚖️⚖️♀️🧹🧙
Judge = Dishonorable Sinead Ni Chulachain = WOMAN
Guardian ad litem for Harry = Ruth Moore O'farrel = WOMAN
At this point, if someone told me these women belong to a secret witches club I would believe it. Such Evil can only be perpetrated by those who worship Satan.
There is a consistent and deeply troubling PATTERN here, one which we can only ignore at our own peril. More and more court players involved in facilitating and executing these draconian orders are turning out to be FEMALES.
These Female judges, for reasons deliberately concealed from us, appear to HATE the natural Mother-Child bond. They know instinctively that the most effective way to inflict lasting psychological damage and traumatize both a mother and her children is through forced separation.
At the heart of all this intentional CRUELTY to children is the REJECTION of the natural, primal Mother-Child bond.
The 50/50 custody model serves to discredit and disrupt this primal bond. It disregards the biological, emotional, and developmental needs of children, especially in their formative years. It treats caregiving like a business contract, as if parenting is a shift-based job, rather than recognizing the continuity, stability, and nurturing that young minds and bodies require.
By rejecting this natural, primal mother-child bond, family, courts not only undermine maternal authority and attachment but also compromise the mental and physical health of both mother and child both in the short term and long term. No healthy child thrives in an arrangement where his or her emotional core is split down the middle to satisfy an illusion of fairness - A 50-50 custody serves the best interest of the manipulative and abusive court NOT the best interest of the child.
This rejection of the mother-child bond is also why they use the word *abduction* ONLY when the child chooses to leave with the mother but NOT when he is forcibly removed by the court and handed to the father against his or her will. Those who still refuse to see the double standards after knowing this are not ignorant - they are fully complicit.
Some female judges may hate mothers but they are all switching custody to fathers for the same reason as male judges: it's their job to keep men in power over "their" women and children after divorce. If they don't, they get out of favor with the Old Boy Network, don't get promoted, or worse, they lose their judgeship.
Family court is about male power and control. Women are disempowered. They have no enforceable rights in family court. Mothers cannot protect their children. Fathers that request child custody usually get it. It doesn't matter if they're emotionally and/or physically abusive. Family court judges frequently do not rule in a child's best interests. Children are considered male property. Women are often falsely deemed unfit. Loving mothers have their children taken. Ripping a child from his or her mother is cruel. Harry was traumatized. Children witness their mothers being handcuffed and taken away by police. Women are jailed or brought in for psychiatric evaluations for no good reason. Facts and evidence don't matter in family court. New laws and training programs won't help. Family court judges abuse their power. They endanger children and face no consequences. Family court judges enable fathers to alienate children from their mothers. Systemic male entitlement dominates family court. The old boys' club rules. Children deserve to be with their primary attachment figures. Loving mothers should receive primary custody. We need a new system. Women must continue to work together and demand a new system. A jury would give women and children a chance at justice. Family court must end.
Shame shame shame on the patriarchy that protect men’s rights over women’s
rights and stories of profound abuses.
They have spread lie after lie and we all fell for it.
SThe patriarchy has systematically demeaned diminished and demonized women right to their deaths.
Any man or woman who is behind this toxic patriarchy deserves zero respect.
That judge is not a woman. That's a man dressed up as a woman. It's part of their satanic religion to swop genders and really have no definable gender like satan. A bit of both.
Infuriating.
I’m in the US and my lawyer said I would have been better off running.
Family court and the notion of parental alienation from the safe parent need to be put down.
The kids refused to return 3 years ago. Dissolution was 6. I represented myself and got full custody 3 months ago.
I’m so sorry for everyone in this mess. 💕
That's great that you finally got custody back--that's rare. But just know that judges almost exclusively falsely accuse mothers of alienation, not fathers. And they enable fathers to alienate children from mothers, like they are doing in Nicola's case. That is because their job is to empower men after divorce. So it is not a "safe parent" issue. It is a women's empowerment issue. See our column about that: https://womenscoalition.substack.com/p/the-parental-alienation-rabbit-hole
I’ve met mothers who have not been so lucky.
It’s a common tactic here, popularized by Woody Allen (whose judge didn’t accept it), when sexual abuse is reported. Women are most often the targets of sexual abuse and nobody listens to us.
From my research advocates of PAS have troubling and unsafe views about children in general.
I know how it’s used now but the overall tactic is not new, it just formalized into a predatory industry trying to add it to the DSM and enforce property rights for parents who should not have access to children.
In my childhood my mother was the abuser and pulled this same number my father, who tried to get emergency custody but was denied. She moved me across the country and I didn’t know my real last name until 6th grade. He died before I could find him.
It was disheartening to discover our legal systemi, and children’s rights had not improved in 50 years and other countries have the same struggle.
The UN did a report on this recently, I included as evidence in my case. I’m