Expose the judge that gave this psycho unsupervised visitation. Let this judge’s name be known all over the world for what he/she failed to do, and that is protect these children.
Absolutely. These judges are complicit in the murders taking place, and any attempt to conceal or protect their identities is tantamount to supporting their abuse and the court facilitated murders.
These pathetic Judges 100% need to be exposed. They are the ones handing out the judgement’s THEY are also responsible for crucifying these little girls and putting them to death, as it’s the equivalent of handing a vulnerable child to a paedophile. 🤬
Family court judges do not rule in a child's best interests. Males that request custody usually get it. It doesn't matter if they're abusive. It makes no difference if they have problematic psychiatric evaluations. Reports of violence are often ignored. Women have no enforceable rights in family court. Mothers cannot protect their children. Facts and evidence don't help. New laws and training programs won't help. Loving mothers have their children taken. They are often falsely deemed unfit. Women are frequently given unwarranted supervised visitation. Men are infrequently given warranted supervised visitation. Family court judges endanger children. They face no consequences. Children deserve to be safe. Paityn, Evelyn and Olivia should be here today.
Whitney should not be suffering their loss. Women must continue to unite and demand a new system. Family court judges abuse their power. They must no longer have the power to do so. We need a new system. A jury would give women and children a chance at justice. Family court must end.
This is why women must speak the truth of abuse that is happening. This mother tried to protect her girls because the father was dangerous and abusive. Those girls, if they had lived to be teenagers, would not go with him to the armory or be with him at all. Speak the truth and shame the devil. They were too young to resist though they were in serious danger. Name the judge too. Let him/her feel the consequences of their horrific decisions.
Many women do speak of the abuse. However, the judges refused to listen. The judges are more concerned with the non-custodial parents, rights, which is usually the father, rather than the rights in the needs of the children.
And this is because many judges and most family court systems are anti-female
God, give this beautiful mother comfort in this most horrific time. I stand beside you momma, we hear you and we support you. God, grant her and her children JUSTICE.. WE NEED TO FIGHT AND MAKE NOISE FOR THIS MOTHER AND ALL MOTHERS AND CHILDREN SUFFERING AT THE HANDS OF THE “JUSTICE” SYSTEM!
Actually, it’s not anger. It’s the need to control. Anger is just a byproduct of not being able to control someone. I think it’s really important that this distinction is made.
Lundy Bancroft has spent countless hours and several amazing books discussing this
These men do not need anger management. They need courses on how to let go of needing to control.
It is difficult to leave a ❤️ on such a post, but if it helps increase its visibility then it must be done. More children taken. Another mother destroyed. I genuinely don’t understand how judges can put them all at risk like this and I agree they should be held accountable. They may as well still be burning us at the stakes.
This routinely happens in Washington family courts. They have over corrected and given abusive men access. When will we really care about women and children!!?
Not until the rights of mothers and children are codified in law. As of 2025, they are still not - not in the Western world that adopted and evolved from English Common Law.
Family courts, rooted in English Common Law, went straight from Coverture (where a married woman (a feme covert) had no legal identity separate from her husband, could not own property, enter contracts, or retain custody of her children) to Family Court judges now as the new overlords. The short-lived Tender Years Doctrine (1930s–1950s) was quickly replaced by the suspiciously convenient and now widely prevalent *best interest of the child* doctrine. This shift served only to consolidate more power in the hands of Family Court judges, while the rights of mothers and children never saw the light of day. The cunning *best interest of the child doctrine* smokescreen essentially transferred power from the father (considered the legal head of household under English Law) to the Family Court judge (under the Uniform Marriage and Divorce Act of 1970), completely bypassing mothers and children and rendering any debate about their rights inconsequential and redundant.
To this day, there is no single federal statute that codifies a mother’s right to her children, or a child’s right to choose which parent he or she feels safe with. Because there is nothing in codified law that guarantees the rights of mothers and children, Family Court judges - with no written law put in place to restrain them - routinely get away with criminal acts by hiding behind judicial discretion and judicial immunity.
What’s urgently needed is federal law that both acknowledges and guarantees the rights of mothers and children - statutes that are binding in court and not subject to the whims of judicial discretion. Judges should follow the law, not make up their own.
Family Courts must be abolished. They are both beyond reform and completely redundant. All matters they currently handle can be addressed in civil courts, with the added benefit of constitutionally mandated due process rights and access to a jury trial.
Last but not least, judicial immunity must be revoked going forward, so judges can finally be held accountable for their abuse of power.
Without these urgent changes the plight of mothers and children will continue.
Agreed. Anything other than that is unnatural. There is a concerted effort to denigrate and wipe out motherhood by first discounting the efforts of a mother—as if they don't matter—and then treating it no different than fatherhood, as if they can EVER be the same.
I have two suggestions which will quickly FIX this inequity and criminal disregard:
1. Stop giving men children for free. Ask for the payment for conceiving and raising the child UPFRONT (and get it in writing - pre-nup). That way, if and when he leaves (more than 50%—particularly in the West—are crappy, loser dads and they will absolutely cheat on their wives without any shame and abandon their own children when it's convenient for them) - when that happens you don't have to chase after him in court for child support. You can kick his ass and look after your child in peace on your own. No need to go to the corrupt family courts and waste money on those scoundrels.
2. Secondly, if they refuse to pay and still want children, tell them to defy and rebel against God/NATURE, ask another man to impregnate them, and carry the baby to term themselves. In other words: "Go F* yourself. I don't owe it to you to carry on your legacy when you cannot even take the responsibility of looking after your own children seriously and when they are an afterthought and not your number one priority. Because if they were, then you would put your money where your mouth is." Say that... and walk away. No explanation needed.
If God Himself gave the Power and the FINAL say in Procreation to the woman, then who are they to force you to do otherwise? Women need to clear their heads, STOP being so male-centric and vulnerable to brainwashing and recognize and embrace the Power bestowed on them by Nature.
The reason men continue to be birthed is because of women. Not a single woman on this planet in the entire history of mankind came out of the body of a man. Every single man on this earth most certainly did. No exceptions. Let that sink in.
People need to stop rationalizing evil as just another garden-variety mental illness.
There is no justification - none whatsoever - for a man killing his own children. That is not illness. That is Evil. Only Evil drives people to ignore, violate, and bypass moral and ethical boundaries. It is the deliberate use of one's Free Will to inflict harm and injustice on another.
Expose the judge that gave this psycho unsupervised visitation. Let this judge’s name be known all over the world for what he/she failed to do, and that is protect these children.
Absolutely. These judges are complicit in the murders taking place, and any attempt to conceal or protect their identities is tantamount to supporting their abuse and the court facilitated murders.
These pathetic Judges 100% need to be exposed. They are the ones handing out the judgement’s THEY are also responsible for crucifying these little girls and putting them to death, as it’s the equivalent of handing a vulnerable child to a paedophile. 🤬
Family court in the USA is unfair to women.
Family court judges do not rule in a child's best interests. Males that request custody usually get it. It doesn't matter if they're abusive. It makes no difference if they have problematic psychiatric evaluations. Reports of violence are often ignored. Women have no enforceable rights in family court. Mothers cannot protect their children. Facts and evidence don't help. New laws and training programs won't help. Loving mothers have their children taken. They are often falsely deemed unfit. Women are frequently given unwarranted supervised visitation. Men are infrequently given warranted supervised visitation. Family court judges endanger children. They face no consequences. Children deserve to be safe. Paityn, Evelyn and Olivia should be here today.
Whitney should not be suffering their loss. Women must continue to unite and demand a new system. Family court judges abuse their power. They must no longer have the power to do so. We need a new system. A jury would give women and children a chance at justice. Family court must end.
This is why women must speak the truth of abuse that is happening. This mother tried to protect her girls because the father was dangerous and abusive. Those girls, if they had lived to be teenagers, would not go with him to the armory or be with him at all. Speak the truth and shame the devil. They were too young to resist though they were in serious danger. Name the judge too. Let him/her feel the consequences of their horrific decisions.
Many women do speak of the abuse. However, the judges refused to listen. The judges are more concerned with the non-custodial parents, rights, which is usually the father, rather than the rights in the needs of the children.
And this is because many judges and most family court systems are anti-female
Family court judges do not deserve immunity. They are arbiter of death for vulnerable children.
God, give this beautiful mother comfort in this most horrific time. I stand beside you momma, we hear you and we support you. God, grant her and her children JUSTICE.. WE NEED TO FIGHT AND MAKE NOISE FOR THIS MOTHER AND ALL MOTHERS AND CHILDREN SUFFERING AT THE HANDS OF THE “JUSTICE” SYSTEM!
Actually, it’s not anger. It’s the need to control. Anger is just a byproduct of not being able to control someone. I think it’s really important that this distinction is made.
Lundy Bancroft has spent countless hours and several amazing books discussing this
These men do not need anger management. They need courses on how to let go of needing to control.
They simply use their anger as a tool to control
It is difficult to leave a ❤️ on such a post, but if it helps increase its visibility then it must be done. More children taken. Another mother destroyed. I genuinely don’t understand how judges can put them all at risk like this and I agree they should be held accountable. They may as well still be burning us at the stakes.
This routinely happens in Washington family courts. They have over corrected and given abusive men access. When will we really care about women and children!!?
Not until the rights of mothers and children are codified in law. As of 2025, they are still not - not in the Western world that adopted and evolved from English Common Law.
Family courts, rooted in English Common Law, went straight from Coverture (where a married woman (a feme covert) had no legal identity separate from her husband, could not own property, enter contracts, or retain custody of her children) to Family Court judges now as the new overlords. The short-lived Tender Years Doctrine (1930s–1950s) was quickly replaced by the suspiciously convenient and now widely prevalent *best interest of the child* doctrine. This shift served only to consolidate more power in the hands of Family Court judges, while the rights of mothers and children never saw the light of day. The cunning *best interest of the child doctrine* smokescreen essentially transferred power from the father (considered the legal head of household under English Law) to the Family Court judge (under the Uniform Marriage and Divorce Act of 1970), completely bypassing mothers and children and rendering any debate about their rights inconsequential and redundant.
To this day, there is no single federal statute that codifies a mother’s right to her children, or a child’s right to choose which parent he or she feels safe with. Because there is nothing in codified law that guarantees the rights of mothers and children, Family Court judges - with no written law put in place to restrain them - routinely get away with criminal acts by hiding behind judicial discretion and judicial immunity.
What’s urgently needed is federal law that both acknowledges and guarantees the rights of mothers and children - statutes that are binding in court and not subject to the whims of judicial discretion. Judges should follow the law, not make up their own.
Family Courts must be abolished. They are both beyond reform and completely redundant. All matters they currently handle can be addressed in civil courts, with the added benefit of constitutionally mandated due process rights and access to a jury trial.
Last but not least, judicial immunity must be revoked going forward, so judges can finally be held accountable for their abuse of power.
Without these urgent changes the plight of mothers and children will continue.
Of course mothers should automatically get primary custody. It shouldn’t even be an issue. It’s a right.
Agreed. Anything other than that is unnatural. There is a concerted effort to denigrate and wipe out motherhood by first discounting the efforts of a mother—as if they don't matter—and then treating it no different than fatherhood, as if they can EVER be the same.
I have two suggestions which will quickly FIX this inequity and criminal disregard:
1. Stop giving men children for free. Ask for the payment for conceiving and raising the child UPFRONT (and get it in writing - pre-nup). That way, if and when he leaves (more than 50%—particularly in the West—are crappy, loser dads and they will absolutely cheat on their wives without any shame and abandon their own children when it's convenient for them) - when that happens you don't have to chase after him in court for child support. You can kick his ass and look after your child in peace on your own. No need to go to the corrupt family courts and waste money on those scoundrels.
2. Secondly, if they refuse to pay and still want children, tell them to defy and rebel against God/NATURE, ask another man to impregnate them, and carry the baby to term themselves. In other words: "Go F* yourself. I don't owe it to you to carry on your legacy when you cannot even take the responsibility of looking after your own children seriously and when they are an afterthought and not your number one priority. Because if they were, then you would put your money where your mouth is." Say that... and walk away. No explanation needed.
If God Himself gave the Power and the FINAL say in Procreation to the woman, then who are they to force you to do otherwise? Women need to clear their heads, STOP being so male-centric and vulnerable to brainwashing and recognize and embrace the Power bestowed on them by Nature.
The reason men continue to be birthed is because of women. Not a single woman on this planet in the entire history of mankind came out of the body of a man. Every single man on this earth most certainly did. No exceptions. Let that sink in.
People need to stop rationalizing evil as just another garden-variety mental illness.
There is no justification - none whatsoever - for a man killing his own children. That is not illness. That is Evil. Only Evil drives people to ignore, violate, and bypass moral and ethical boundaries. It is the deliberate use of one's Free Will to inflict harm and injustice on another.
May those angels haunt his conscience.