Terrified Toddler Taken Screaming & Crying from Bed: Forced to Live with Molester Father
And: Dr. Pridgeon Goes on Trial
The Irish Daily Mail published an investigative piece this week on an especially heart-wrenching Post-Separation Crisis [PSC] case.
A terrified toddler was taken from her bed, screaming and crying, pulling her hair in distress, forced to leave her home with her mother and go live with her father who was given sole custody.
This action came, unsurprisingly to WCN&V readers, after she disclosed sexual abuse to many professionals, not to mention her mother (which, of course, is given zero weight in the supremely sexist Family Court system).
This Irish case not only provides a good, international example of the cover up and enabling of sexual abuse by fathers in family courts; it also exemplifies how mothers’ attorneys sell them down the Patriarchal River.
In other news, we’ll profile Dr. Pridgeon and his co-defendants going on trial tomorrow as a result of helping to hide children from molester fathers, as well as announce the next Sisters in Solidarity Forum, and provide a link to the latest chapter in Dr. Blue’s Saga of One F**ked Mother.
First, the Terrified Toddler story.
TERRIFIED TODDLER
A toddler told her mother about how her father, a prominent Irish businessman, was sexually abusing her. The girl, whom we’ll call ‘Ava’, also told her pediatrician about the abuse.
The doctor did his mandated duty and reported to TUSLA—Ireland’s version of Child Protection Services (CPS). [We’ll just use CPS from now on since that is universally understood.] Ava told social workers, amongst many other details regarding the abuse, that she feels sad when her father touches her privates and that her father is “bad”.
Soon after that, Ava made more disclosures of abuse to her doctor and he made another report to CPS. CPS asserted they have “significant concern” about Ava’s safety and referred her for a specialist medical assessment.
Given the number, continuity and seriousness of the disclosures, we remain seriously concerned about [girl’s] safety and wellbeing.
The specialist doctor claimed he could not “definitively” determine she was being sexually abused but recommended full investigations by CPS and Police. The forensic interviewer said s/he was “very concerned” following the child’s disclosures.
All this “concern” by professionals that would go unheeded in Family Court.
The police opened an investigation into the child sexual abuse, as well as the father’s illegal coercive control of the mother. Both investigations remain active to this day.
JUDGE ENABLES MOLESTER FATHER
The pediatrician told the mother that she needed to keep her daughter away from the father due to the clear disclosures of sexual abuse. Ava’s mother expressed fear to the doctor of violating Family Court orders but decided to take his advice.
I have advised [mother] to keep [daughter] with her in light of this disclosure. [Mother] says she is afraid to do so because of the court order.
Just hours after CPS informed the father of his daughter’s disclosures of sexual abuse, in true abuser form, he filed a motion for an “Enforcement of [Custody] Orders” in Family Court.
A hearing was scheduled.
Here’s where it becomes obvious the mother’s attorney is selling her down the Patriarchal River, i.e. colluding with the judge to cover up the father’s abuse. The attorney told Ava’s mother she was not expected to be at the hearing as it was just to schedule a full hearing on the matter. So she did not attend, likely having other things to do—like work.
But, surprise, surprise, it turns out it was a regular hearing at which the judge executed the old custody switch to the father on the grounds the mother had breached the custody order by not allowing the scheduled visit with the father. The judge also granted the father’s request for a Protective Order against the mother. She was restricted to occasional supervised visits.
To be clear: the judge knew what he was doing. CPS had issued their report to Family Court, which detailed the daughter’s many disclosures of sexual abuse to them and the other professionals. And the judge knew there was a current police investigation into the sexual abuse and coercive control by the father.
The judge had all the corroborating facts and evidence which supported the mother’s concern and justified her not allowing the visit. S/he chose to disregard them—a deliberate covering up and enabling of child sexual abuse by a father.
This custody switch happened unbeknownst to Ava’s mother and her attorney did not inform her of this. So when the police came (with the father) that night to take Ava she reacted with “shock and horror”.
The police knocked at my door around 8:30 and told me that there had been a hearing and that my daughter needs to go with her father, who was standing there too.
NEW JUDGE ASSIGNED
That all happened last year. At some point a new (female) judge was assigned, which is not uncommon in these cases. It’s easier to cover up father-child abuse when new judges continually come on the scene. Judges simply rely on the doctrine of “Res Judicata” (already been decided by another judge) or some version of that washing-of-the-hands, showing absolutely no concern for the truth or the children.
Ava’s mother asked the new judge to return custody to her, since it had been wrongfully removed and was in Ava’s best interest. Of course, the newbie judge refused to do such a thing. She simply expressed concern (ahhh more concern!) about “the impact on Ava of the long separation her mother”.
The judge confirmed there was no evidence to support Ava should have been, or should continue to be, completely separated from her mother. But she did nothing about it. Why? Did she not want to go up against the OBN?
The investigative journalist asked CPS if the “Signs of Safety”, a mandatory legal process of ensuring a child’s safety, “remains sufficient in light of the new living arrangement” (i.e. living with a credibly accused molester father). CPS deflected, saying they cannot speak about confidential cases. But they could have simply confirmed they were doing their job—or not. They chose not to. Wonder why? Because CPS defers to Family Court judges, who have the ultimate power, and they do not want the public to know that.
NOTE: TUSLA/CPS aided greatly in the taking of Sinead O’Connor’s son from her. A few years later, her son later ended his life, which only The Women’s Coalition linked to the maternal deprivation ordered by Family Court in a previous column: Sinead O’Connor’s Son Ends His Life.
Not long after her son committed suicide, Sinead also died, her death almost certainly related to her grieving of the loss of her son: Sinead's Passing Follows Son's Suicide; Both Follow Judicially-Enabled Alienation.
SOME WCI VIEWS
Although the Irish Daily Mail journalist was obviously well-intentioned, she continually refers to Ava’s disclosures of sexual abuse as “allegations”. But children do not allege abuse; they disclose it.
The word “allege” plays into the patriarchal narrative which frames disclosures of abuse as just accusations. This sets the scene and makes it easier for the perpetrator father to counterattack and claim the allegation is false. Mothers are also said to “allege” abuse by the father when, in fact, they are reporting what their child “disclosed”. Language is important.
Also, the investigative journalist did not do the obvious and name the judges responsible for failing to protect Ava. Is she afraid? Of what? The Good Old Boys? Journalists’ main job is to not only expose corruption, but to hold those accountable for engaging in it, especially if it involves a cover up of sexual abuse causing the child to continue to be molested.
The fact that this Irish case follows the internationally-occurring PSC pattern supports that it stems from the patriarchal underpinnings of Family Court. It is right out of the OBN playbook of how to entitle fathers after divorce and enable them to sexually abuse their children, their property—something the OBN has been doing for centuries, which Freud inadvertently revealed before he was shot down.
To a Family Court outsider, the extreme measure of taking a 3 year-old completely away from her mother, who believed she was being sexually abused and was following a doctor’s orders, is incomprehensible. People do not understand [yet] that there is no way for a mother to protect her children if the father wants to abuse them. Thanks to the specially-designed Family Court system.
The general public is unaware that there is a Post-Separation Crisis fueled by the agenda to entitle and empower a father to continue to control women and children after divorce. In other words, Family Court is the staging grounds for the very foundation of patriarchy: men’s power in “his” family.
Help raise awareness about the Crisis by joining The Women’s Coalition.
IN OTHER NEWS
DR PRIDGEON AND FRIENDS GO ON TRIAL
Our friends, Dr. Russell Pridgeon, Patrick O’Dea, and Grandma Ann go on trial tomorrow, Monday at 10am—which is actually today in the Western Hemisphere.
The trial will be held at: Brisbane District Court, 415 George St., Brisbane, Queensland; Judge Loury, Floor 9, Court 35.
It is scheduled to go on for nearly a month—until March 1st. Dr. Pridgeon says that is because it will take that long to expose all the corruption involved in covering up the sexual abuse of the children.
It would be great if our Aussie Coalitionists and Sisters could go there and support them on any of the trial days. If you’d like to wear a Women’s Coalition t-shirt, hold signs or hand out flyers, email womenscoalitionintl@gmail.com.
For the in depth story on this PSC case, see our previous post: "Everybody Knows": New Book by Doctor Who's on Trial for Hiding Kids from Rapist Fathers. Dr. Pridgeon’s book tells the whole truth and can be bought on Amazon.
IN BRIEF: Russ (which Dr. Pridgeon likes being referred to), Patrick, and Grandma Ann helped to hide children from fathers who were molesting them. They were successful for a number of years, but were caught in 2018.
They were subjected to a malicious prosecution. They were originally charged with felony “child stealing”—as part of a child trafficking ring, and a slew of other bogus charges. The charges were eventually pared down to three counts each of “defeating the course of justice” (i.e. violating a [Family Court] judge’s order). Each charge carries a maximum of 10 years—which means a max of 30 years in prison for violating a Family Court judge’s order (in an effort to protect kids, no less).
This pruning of charges was a strategic move. It allows the criminal court judge to exclude evidence of sexual abuse on irrelevance (supposedly), and still hit them with an incredibly draconian punishment—for daring to challenge male entitlement to sexually abuse their children.
Will Judge Loury go along to get along? We shall see.
We’ll be updating on this important case, so watch this page…
SISTERS IN SOLIDARITY FEBRUARY FORUM
Our next Sisters in Solidarity Forum will be Saturday, February 17th, 1pm Pacific; 4pm Eastern; 9pm GMT/UTC.
In order to join our forum, you need to join Sisters in Solidarity [SIS], where we are mobilizing a counteroffensive to regain our long-lost power to keep and protect our children and our resources/money post-separation.
If you are interested in joining the Sisterhood, please read this column. If you agree with the Women’s Coalition’s position on the Post-Separation Crisis—that it is a women’s empowerment issue, fill out the form linked in the column.
You will be sent the zoom invitation a few days before the forum (check alternate boxes and spam). Please do not share the link; the forum is only for SIS’s.
CHAPTER 4 OF “THE SAGA OF ONE F**KED MOTHER
Chapter 4 of Mother-Fucking: The Saga of One Fucked Mother was published Wednesday. It is entitled “No Witnesses, But Hey, Still No Contact”.
The Saga is Dr. Blue's seminal novel about her fateful encounter with Family Court and the Post-Separation Crisis. A chapter a week is published every Wednesday in our new section “Saga of One F**ked Mother”, conveniently accessible on the top bar of Women’s Coalition News & Views home page. This section contains all previously posted chapters for easy access.
The first excerpt from The Saga includes the Prologue, Chapter 1: A Couple of Definitions, and Chapter 2: How, How in the World Did We Get Here from There? Chapter 3: Holocausts followed.
Of course, WCN&V Subscribers will find each new chapter in their inboxes every Wednesday, so keep an eye out—you will not want to miss them!
You can also give a gift subscription to a mother who is going through her own Family Court nightmare and doesn’t understand why.
Or support the Coalition’s work through a one-time or recurring contribution at paypal.me/TheWomensCoalition
All contributions, large and small, are greatly appreciated!
Family court is filled with sadistic monsters. It's hard to get past the title, but I feel we have to in order to be reminded of what we're up against. Children should be safe in their own beds. Women have to keep fighting to protect children. Family court will continue to enforce systemic male entitlement and endanger children unless they lose their power to do so. Family court needs to end.
I've been in front of two separate judges who went behind into Chambers with the lawyers who came back out and threw the fight but not before sentencing me to pay the court for their time and trouble one of did just what you say and told me I did not need to show up or speak because it was just to schedule an omnibus hearing to question people under oath my own attorney mind you and the other was my friend from childhood who told me if I didn't do what the judge wanted he was going to take my baby and give it to her abuser so I fired him in open court because he would not quit and went on and won my case and only because my ex lost his s*** not because the government did the right thing by us because we all know we're collateral damage they do not care about as in all war. And of course they were both rewarded.