Brazen Cover Up of Sexual Abuse by New Jersey Family Court Judges

A Ton of Evidence Is Being Disregarded & Concealed

A brave New Jersey mother has been desperately trying to protect her young daughter from sexual abuse by her biological father. A ton of evidence is being disregarded and concealed.

Ria has recently lost custody and all contact with her daughter. She is in fear for her daughter’s life as he has tortured and strangled her to keep her quiet.

Ria’s judges, aided and abetted by the usual Family Court accomplices, are all covering up the sexual abuse. As usual.

What sets this mother’s case apart from the thousands of others like it, though, is the pure brazenness of the cover-up. It stands out for the sheer volume of evidence and witnesses the judges are discounting and disregarding in their efforts to enable the father to continue his patriarchally endowed prerogative.

This case fittingly follows our recent column Groundbreaking Study Confirms Judges Are Knowingly Enabling Molester Fathers, which highlights a new, empirical study validating that judges and their minions are colluding in covering up and enabling child molester fathers. It also evokes Rachel’s story, the mother who was recently jailed to punish and silence her after reporting the sexual abuse of her child.

Ria’s story is as insane as it is heartbreaking...

RIA’S STORY

Ria

Ria and her ex dated for 3 years before getting married in 2015.

Soon after the wedding, her husband began to emotionally abuse her via coercive control. She became isolated from family and friends and went from being very active, having a career, traveling a lot, having a fun social life, to being a virtual hermit.

Ria gave birth to their daughter, M.C., in 2019. The emotional abuse escalated greatly and the physical abuse began. He even began raping Ria.

After one failed attempt at escape, she finally got the courage to leave him for good in 2021.

Ria temporarily retained primary custody of 2 year old M.C. The split was 65/35.

The abuse continued during the visitation exchanges. At one exchange, his violence caused an orthopedic injury which required medical treatment.

Last year in February of 2023, M.C. came back from a visit with her father complaining of pain and itching in her privates. Ria took her to the pediatrician.

M.C. disclosed sexual abuse and the doctor made a report to CPS [DCPP: Division of Child Protection and Permanency in New Jersey] and made a report. That was the first disclosure. The CPS caseworker interviewed M.C. and made a finding of “unfounded”.

The father had been placed on supervised visitation for two months, then he was rewarded with extra parenting time. It went to a 55/45 split.

During the next year of unsupervised visits with nearly equal parenting time, M.C. made many more disclosures to many professionals.

THE EVIDENCE

PHYSICAL

Over 10 medical reports of injuries to M.C.’s private parts when returning from her father’s house, including:

• Acute vaginitis with abrasions, anal fissures, UTI, vaginal and anal erythema (inflammation), rash on labia, dermatitis on private parts, perianal redness…

• Medically diagnosed bruising, lacerations to her body

• Medically diagnosed encopresis, enuresis as well as various psychological symptoms related to abuse: regression, anxiety related headaches and stomach aches, nail picking, insomnia, nightmares

FORENSIC

• Forensic expert (audio recorded): “My daddy takes his pants off and he tells me to touch his penis. He also does it to the dogs, they touch the dogs penises and vaginas. He takes my panties off and he holds them in his hand and he touches my vagina. Last time he hit me in the face. I don’t know why he’s hitting me. He has a smile on his face when he’s hitting me.”

• Forensic evaluation determined sexual and physical abuse had occurred.

• Two forensic parenting evaluations of Ria determined it is very unlikely that she coached M.C.

• Psychiatric evaluation of the father showed psychopathic traits

CPS

• CPS caseworker: “I don’t like my daddy because he touches my vagina with his fingers”. She demonstrated by lifting her skirt up and rubbing her hand on her vagina.

• Different CPS caseworker (video recording available): “I’m scared of daddy because he touches me hard on my vagina under my clothes, with his hand and his fingers, while he’s dressed, undressed or in a bathing suit, in the bedroom, in the bathroom, and everywhere and he doesn’t ask for my permission to touch me…”

• CPS received over 15 reports of abuse of M.C. by mandated reporters, including doctors, teachers, clergy, babysitter…

MANDATED REPORTERS

• Pediatrician: (written report available) “I’m afraid of daddy. Daddy always shows me his penis and touches my vagina, can you help make this bad stuff end?”

• Another Pediatrician: “I’m a bad girl, I did some very bad things, I touched daddy’s penis. They (dad and his girlfriend) touch my vagina and they don’t even ask me. I tell them to stop but they don’t listen and they touch my vagina.”

• Babysitter: “My dad touches me here [pointing to her vaginal area] with his whole hand [as she rubbed her hand against her vaginal area].

• Teachers: 17 reports in writing from 4 different teachers detailing M.C.’s disclosures of physical and sexual abuse, including drawings. Here are some quotes to teachers:

1. "Dad touched my vagina but I didn't want to, so he asked me to touch his penis. I didn't want to.”

2.  “My daddy hits me in the face, he grabs a stick and he hits me, and he touches my vagina.”

3. “I don’t feel safe at daddy’s house, there are a lot of bad people at my daddy’s house.”

4. “My daddy does some forbidden things to me.” She drew 2 people, one with 3 legs and told the teacher “This is my daddy with his big penis.” She drew another character next to him with her vagina sticking down  and said “This is me, with my vagina.”

POLICE

• Reports made by Ria re: threats of violence against her [no action taken]

• Reports made by Ria re: M.C.’s disclosures of sexual abuse [no action taken]

DISCLOSURES TO RIA

There were countless disclosures by M.C. to Ria, many videotaped.

• “I touched grandpa’s penis. They all told me to. He has a big penis and sometimes it’s small too. There is a lot of white and brown hair around his penis that is straight but also a little bit like this [demonstrating a zigzag motion].”

• [Two women] tell me to put my fingers inside their vaginas like this [demonstrating an upward motion]. It’s yucky and slimy.”

• “I don’t like it when they wake me to touch them. I just want to sleep. And it’s worse when they all want to touch me, especially when they bring the stick. Sometimes they do it all at the same time, they put the stick inside my butt and their fingers inside my vagina and then they switch.” 

• “They like to attack me when it’s dark. They wake me and I kick and tell them to stop but they don’t listen and yell at me to be quiet and stay still.”

EVIDENCE DISREGARDED & CONCEALED

With all this new evidence over the course of the year, CPS not only continued to “unfound” M.C.’s disclosures of abuse to the 15 professionals, they switched the focus of the investigation to Ria. Calling abuse by a father “unfounded” is a license to turn the focus on the mother for coaching, or somehow causing, a child to report abuse.

In March, an order was made that prohibited Ria from taking M.C. to a doctor or a therapist without the father’s permission. And any therapist she goes to may not talk about the abuse with M.C. This is a common way judges silence children and mothers and cover up father-child abuse.

Ria was also no longer allowed to speak her native language (French) with her daughter, even though that was M.C.s primary language. M.C. also cannot speak French now that she is solely with her father.

Then, in June, M.C. told Ria about a particularly violent incident at her last visit with her father. She said he had punched and strangled her while telling her she had to stop telling about the abuse. He said what he was doing to her was supposed to be their “secret”. This is consistent with kinds of torture perps use to silence victims.

THE LAST STRAW

Ria was terrified for her daughter’s life. Strangulation is a known precursor to murder. So she reported it, fearful of repercussions, since they were obviously trying to silence her.

That was the last straw. That report made in an attempt to protect her daughter resulted in Ria losing her child. It prompted the inevitable last step used by judges to silence women and children.

In New Jersey, CPS has the power to remove a child temporarily from a parent until a hearing in Family Court can be held. It is called a “Dodd removal”. However, it is only for extreme emergencies when a child is in imminent physical danger.

Despite the fact the removal did not comply with the law, CPS used it to take M.C. immediately away from Ria without due process. They accused her of emotional abuse, which does not meet the emergency removal standard. Not surprisingly, the judge later ruled that the removal was lawful—i.e. he lied in service of the cover up.

Ria was found to be unstable and the abuser. Both Mad and Bad. Ria, who, before her daughter disclosed sexual abuse, was an upstanding member of the community with no mental health issues, is now deemed Crazy and a Liar.

To support this, the judge claimed she had taken M.C. to the doctor too many times. This implied she suffered from “Factitious Disorder”, a common false finding used to strip mothers of custody when there is nothing else to hang their hat on.

The removal of M.C. facilitates brainwashing the child into silence when all else has not worked. Isolating a young child from her/his primary attachment figurer, their mother, their protector, is enough to cause them to form a trauma bond with the perp father. That is a psychological survival mechanism that causes children to attach to and appease the perpetrator.

In older children, a “Reunification Therapist” is used to do the brainwashing. This brainwashing of child victims of Family Court is a critical component of the cover up of sexual abuse. More in depth exposure of this tactic is covered in a previous column: How Family Court Judges Weaponize Mind Control.

IN SUMMARY

In summary, M.C. told 15 mandated reporters about the abuse, of which there exists 80 recorded disclosures. She had over 10 medically diagnosed injuries to her private parts and body when returning from her father's.

A forensic expert confirmed the abuse; two pediatricians, 4 teachers, the babysitter, friends and family members. And still the Family Court judges are brazenly saying Ria is the abuser. They are threatening Ria with “severe sanctions” [read: jail and no custody/visitation] if she continues to talk about the abuse publicly.

Fortunately, Ria had already gone public with what her child had disclosed. Unfortunately for the judges, they cannot stop the truth from getting to the public by activists.

Judge Michael Jimenez (left; Judge Gary Potters (right)

There are at least three judges who are involved in the cover up: Judge Stevie Chambers (main judge), Judge Gary Potters, and Judge Michael Jimenez. [If anyone can find a picture of Judge Chambers, please send to womenscoalitionintl@gmail.com and we will add it.]

FINANCIAL DEVASTATION

Ria, like most mothers caught in the Family Court Nightmare, has been financially devastated. She has spent over $500,000 trying to protect her daughter.

This is part of the program: a poor mother is much easier to silence than a rich one, so the case is strung along until the mother has no more money and must represent herself.

On top of that, the father is wealthy and manipulated their finances, depriving Ria of her fair share of marital assets. Between his deception and the enormous amount of money spent on litigation, she is now penniless.

To add insult to injury, the judge has recently ordered Ria to pay her ex $70,000, plummeting her further into debt. And now that he has sole custody, she will likely be ordered to pay child support.

The perp and his enablers must be laughing all the way to the court. Not to mention the satisfaction of the Old Boys…Another uppity woman bites the dust.

TAKEAWAYS

There can be no better proof than Ria’s case that the use of confidentiality—via threats of jail and loss of custody, if not actual gag orders—serves to protect perpetrator fathers, not children. It is merely an extension of the manipulative, patriarchal narrative: it’s a private family matter.

This self-serving narrative has enabled fathers to get away with their abuse of wives and children for centuries. What’s more, it would be quite easy to simply require children’s names to be redacted. But that is not really what it’s about. It’s about empowering the father, and to do that, his crimes must be covered up. And to do that, judges need virtually absolute power.

Hence the creation of the Family Court system. To empower and entitle the almighty father, and oppress and punish the woman who dares challenge his authority.

Ria has never been afforded due process. It is impossible to get due process with judges having, effectively, absolute power. Custody Crisis cases must be heard in a Real Court before a jury. Please join The Women’s Coalition where we are fighting for a new system.

There are other advocates and reporters covering Ria’s case, which is good for exposing the injustice, but, unfortunately, they are getting the cause of the Crisis wrong. Some have gone down the Money Rabbit Hole and some the Abuse Rabbit Hole. They contend that the cases are primarily about abuse rather than power and it is the “Family Court industry” that is driving it.

However, neither these Rabbit Holes, nor the many others exposed in our Custody Crisis Rabbit Holes series can explain the thousands of cases similar to Ria’s around the world. The only common denominator is judges empowering men in their role as ex-husband/father and disempowering women in their role as ex-wife/mother, i.e. systemic male entitlement and female oppression.

WHAT’S NEXT

Ria has a hearing on Thursday at which the judge is going to rule on whether she can have access to Family Court and CPS records and transcripts. This is one way they are able to get away with the cover up: keep her from having the records that support what her daughter has disclosed.

The judge may take this opportunity to make a more official gag order.

The next step in the scheme is to jail the mother. That requires a finding of contempt. So that may happen at the trial this week as well.

Unfortunately, the hearing is private, however, the judges cannot get away completely with their cover up without the public knowing just how much evidence they are disregarding and concealing, since the evidence was already public.

Hopefully, with The Women’s Coalition and other activists watching, the judges will change their tune and do the right thing. And they will do what is really in the best interests of M.C. and return her to Ria.

MSM is looking into Ria’s case and may be covering it. Journalists may contact us at womenscoalitionintl@gmail.com for comment and perspective.

Watch this space…

Please sign the Petition at Justice for MC.

Share this article to help shed light on the injustice Ria and her daughter and so many other mothers and children are experiencing.

---

SEXUAL ABUSE SURVEY

The Women’s Coalition is documenting the cover up of sexual abuse in Family Court.

If your judge(s) did not protect your child from sexual abuse by the father, please help by filling out this form.

---

IN OTHER NEWS

CHAPTER 26: The Overture [3rd part] Is Out!

CHAPTER 26 of Mother-Fucking: The Saga of One Fucked Mother is “The Overture”. This chapter is too long for a newsletter so it will be posted in parts. This is the third part.

In this next part of "The Overture”, Legion continues to revisit Herry’s [Petitioner’s] sworn-under-oath opening declaration/affidavit, which he divides into 4 sections: A, B, C, and D. She continues to call him out on his lies, distortions and errors about their marriage and family. In his bid to get sole custody of the boys, Herry claims Legion is the dangerous parent and he the protective one, an obvious projection from the sociopathic mind of an abuser.

Legion [Respondent] is annoyed that she is tasked with the job of rebutting all the lies he’s told about her—why should she have to defend herself anyway? And will the judge, or anyone, really even care? But she sets herself to the task of rebuttal, starting with section A.

Dr. Blue’s novel is based on her own experience of the Custody Crisis. It uniquely conveys how Family Court judges are “mother-fucking” women—a form of systemic oppression and violence directed at ex-wives—as protagonist Legion is systematically and methodically deprived of her children and money and reduced to “one fucked mother”.

Chapters are stand-alone interesting so you can begin reading anywhere. A Cast of Characters follows to help readers at any point [on the web page]. All published chapters are included in the Section: “Saga of One F**ked Mother” accessible on the top bar of the home page of Women’s Coalition News & Views. Sequential chapters are published every Wednesday and subscribers will find them in their inboxes, so make sure to subscribe if you haven’t yet!

TEASERS 

What the most difficult about rebuttal is … is doing it!  Having to do it at all.  Why should I have to?  Why again and again and again do I have to?  Have to defend myself.  Always, always, always on the defensive throughout the entirety of The Opera.  The whole mother‑fucking thing.

But, otherwise, this is the statistical reality:  fathers and their gametes are not to be messed with.  Both are only to be exalted.  Sperm exaltation.  Father and fatherhood exaltation.  

---

You may also give a gift subscription to a friend who is going through the Family Court nightmare.

Or feel free to support the Coalition’s work through a one-time or recurring contribution at paypal.me/TheWomensCoalition.

All contributions are greatly appreciated and thanks to everyone who has subscribed!